PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.43%
Positive revenue growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
18.36%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FLNC's 12.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
72.53%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FLNC's 31.82%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
72.53%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FLNC's 31.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
71.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x FLNC's 33.80%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
84.62%
EPS growth above 1.5x FLNC's 34.69%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
84.62%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FLNC's 34.69%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
82.78%
Share count expansion well above FLNC's 0.82%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
82.78%
Diluted share count expanding well above FLNC's 0.82%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Negative OCF growth while FLNC is at 59.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.02%
Negative FCF growth while FLNC is at 59.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-25.39%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FLNC stands at 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-25.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FLNC stands at 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-25.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FLNC stands at 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
39.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FLNC's 34.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
39.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FLNC's 34.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
39.61%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FLNC's 34.61%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
15.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
15.25%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
15.25%
Positive short-term CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
6.09%
Below 50% of FLNC's 1147.93%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
6.09%
Below 50% of FLNC's 1147.93%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
6.09%
Below 50% of FLNC's 1147.93%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.50%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. FLNC's 15.54%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
26.99%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FLNC's 66.01%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.46%
Negative asset growth while FLNC invests at 23.27%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-46.76%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-4.00%
We’re deleveraging while FLNC stands at 754.76%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-67.59%
Our R&D shrinks while FLNC invests at 6.96%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-38.21%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.