PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.31%
Revenue growth under 50% of FLNC's 71.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FLNC's 76.39%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.01%
EBIT growth below 50% of FLNC's 47.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.01%
Operating income growth under 50% of FLNC's 52.32%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.62%
Net income growth under 50% of FLNC's 45.24%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
15.38%
EPS growth under 50% of FLNC's 48.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
15.38%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FLNC's 48.36%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FLNC's 4.73%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FLNC's 4.73%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.15%
Negative OCF growth while FLNC is at 243.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-40.72%
Negative FCF growth while FLNC is at 267.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
0.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FLNC's 147.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
0.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FLNC's 147.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
0.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FLNC's 147.77%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
107.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 204.63%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
107.97%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 204.63%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
107.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 204.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
11.45%
Below 50% of FLNC's 84.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
11.45%
Below 50% of FLNC's 84.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
11.45%
Below 50% of FLNC's 84.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.54%
Our AR growth while FLNC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-32.82%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.76%
Positive asset growth while FLNC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.47%
Positive BV/share change while FLNC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.49%
Debt shrinking faster vs. FLNC's 12.29%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
5.97%
R&D dropping or stable vs. FLNC's 12.87%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.44%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FLNC's 23.59%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.