PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.31%
Revenue growth under 50% of FLNC's 154.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
17.79%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FLNC's 89.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.79%
EBIT growth below 50% of FLNC's 1380.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.79%
Operating income growth under 50% of FLNC's 760.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-149.00%
Negative net income growth while FLNC stands at 5994.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-147.93%
Negative EPS growth while FLNC is at 5965.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-147.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FLNC is at 5946.51%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.08%
Share count expansion well above FLNC's 0.76%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.08%
Slight or no buyback while FLNC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-452.24%
Negative OCF growth while FLNC is at 148.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-615.27%
Negative FCF growth while FLNC is at 118.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
55.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 96.96%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
55.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 96.96%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
55.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FLNC's 150.60%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
46.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
46.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FLNC's 103.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-34.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FLNC is at 1761.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-34.27%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FLNC is 1761.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-34.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FLNC is 121.07%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
173.60%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 299.12%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
173.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 299.12%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
173.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 234.44%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.48%
AR growth well above FLNC's 44.43%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-17.95%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.87%
Asset growth well under 50% of FLNC's 12.56%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-4.79%
We have a declining book value while FLNC shows 11.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.22%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
20.73%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. FLNC's 22.54%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
13.94%
SG&A growth well above FLNC's 14.67%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.