PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.25%
Revenue growth under 50% of FLNC's 39.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.43%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FLNC's 109.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
18.60%
EBIT growth below 50% of FLNC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
18.60%
Operating income growth under 50% of FLNC's 118.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
23.79%
Net income growth under 50% of FLNC's 120.14%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
312.05%
EPS growth above 1.5x FLNC's 120.83%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
312.05%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FLNC's 104.17%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.92%
Share count expansion well above FLNC's 0.57%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.92%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FLNC's 41.28%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.78%
Positive OCF growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
138.00%
Positive FCF growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.90%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.90%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FLNC's 7.27%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
138.54%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
138.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
138.54%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
48.55%
Below 50% of FLNC's 106.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
48.55%
Below 50% of FLNC's 106.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
48.55%
Below 50% of FLNC's 113.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
170.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with FLNC's 180.08%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
170.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with FLNC's 180.08%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
170.11%
Positive short-term equity growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.92%
We show growth while FLNC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.07%
Positive asset growth while FLNC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.63%
50-75% of FLNC's 3.78%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-1.99%
We’re deleveraging while FLNC stands at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.67%
R&D dropping or stable vs. FLNC's 17.60%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.00%
We expand SG&A while FLNC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.