PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.55%
Revenue growth under 50% of FLNC's 39.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.14%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FLNC's 109.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
60.83%
EBIT growth 50-75% of FLNC's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
61.13%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of FLNC's 118.19%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
70.37%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FLNC's 120.14%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
-110.47%
Negative EPS growth while FLNC is at 120.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-110.47%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FLNC is at 104.17%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.84%
Share count expansion well above FLNC's 0.57%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.84%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FLNC's 41.28%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.55%
Positive OCF growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
55.30%
Positive FCF growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
88.33%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
88.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
35.59%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FLNC's 7.27%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
166.35%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
166.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
154.90%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
87.21%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of FLNC's 106.10%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
87.21%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of FLNC's 106.10%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
97.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of FLNC's 113.75%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
182.87%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with FLNC's 180.08%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
182.87%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with FLNC's 180.08%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-46.77%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.94%
Our AR growth while FLNC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.16%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
8.61%
Positive asset growth while FLNC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.12%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FLNC's 3.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.60%
We’re deleveraging while FLNC stands at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-4.82%
Our R&D shrinks while FLNC invests at 17.60%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.35%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.