PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.54%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GTLB's 8.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.47%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x GTLB's 8.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-9.37%
Negative EBIT growth while GTLB is at 79.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.37%
Negative operating income growth while GTLB is at 79.74%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-6.24%
Negative net income growth while GTLB stands at 76.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-6.25%
Negative EPS growth while GTLB is at 76.92%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-6.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GTLB is at 76.92%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.58%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while GTLB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
100.00%
Similar to GTLB's 100.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while GTLB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
16.60%
We increase R&D while GTLB cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
10.50%
We expand SG&A while GTLB cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.