PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.88%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x GTLB's 8.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
10.20%
Gross profit growth similar to GTLB's 10.42%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
5.49%
EBIT growth below 50% of GTLB's 18.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.49%
Operating income growth under 50% of GTLB's 18.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
8.47%
Net income growth at 50-75% of GTLB's 16.53%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
9.09%
EPS growth at 50-75% of GTLB's 15.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of GTLB's 15.15%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.96%
Share count expansion well above GTLB's 0.84%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.96%
Diluted share count expanding well above GTLB's 0.84%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.07%
Positive OCF growth while GTLB is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
55.27%
Positive FCF growth while GTLB is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
9.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GTLB's 135.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
9.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GTLB's 135.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GTLB's 135.04%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
94.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while GTLB is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
94.18%
Positive OCF/share growth while GTLB is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
94.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GTLB is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
33.88%
Below 50% of GTLB's 69.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
33.88%
Below 50% of GTLB's 69.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
33.88%
Below 50% of GTLB's 69.03%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
178.58%
Below 50% of GTLB's 394.27%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
178.58%
Below 50% of GTLB's 394.27%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
178.58%
Below 50% of GTLB's 394.27%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.32%
AR growth well above GTLB's 35.59%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-8.83%
Inventory is declining while GTLB stands at 13.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.32%
Similar asset growth to GTLB's 4.37%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-1.13%
We have a declining book value while GTLB shows 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
466.43%
Debt growth of 466.43% while GTLB is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
9.27%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. GTLB's 6.24%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.22%
We expand SG&A while GTLB cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.