33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.61%
Positive revenue growth while TOST is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.34%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of TOST's 3.90%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-21.46%
Negative EBIT growth while TOST is at 56.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.46%
Negative operating income growth while TOST is at 34.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
50.35%
Net income growth at 50-75% of TOST's 75.00%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
52.38%
EPS growth at 50-75% of TOST's 77.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
52.38%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of TOST's 68.86%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
0.99%
Share count expansion well above TOST's 1.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.99%
Diluted share count expanding well above TOST's 0.50%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.52%
Positive OCF growth while TOST is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
142.32%
Positive FCF growth while TOST is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
35.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of TOST's 168.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of TOST's 168.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
35.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of TOST's 119.65%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
127.09%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of TOST's 155.79%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
127.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of TOST's 155.79%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
127.09%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of TOST's 247.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
37.87%
Below 50% of TOST's 131.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
37.87%
Below 50% of TOST's 131.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
37.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while TOST is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-5.83%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while TOST stands at 397.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-5.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while TOST is at 397.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-5.83%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while TOST is at 28.65%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.06%
Firm’s AR is declining while TOST shows 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
37.20%
We show growth while TOST is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.84%
Asset growth well under 50% of TOST's 6.48%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.04%
We have a declining book value while TOST shows 7.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.62%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
9.02%
SG&A growth well above TOST's 1.92%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.