33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.43%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
18.36%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
72.53%
EBIT growth of 72.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
72.53%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
71.92%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
84.62%
EPS growth of 84.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
84.62%
Diluted EPS growth of 84.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
82.78%
Share change of 82.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
82.78%
Diluted share change of 82.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is -5.81%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-3.02%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is -4.20%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-25.39%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 32.22%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-25.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 20.02%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-25.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 19.93%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
39.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 39.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
39.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 39.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
39.61%
3Y OCF/share growth of 39.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
15.25%
Net income/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger might see typical industry-level profit expansion over 10 years.
15.25%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
15.25%
3Y net income/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger sees standard sector-level performance in the last few years.
6.09%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
6.09%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
6.09%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.50%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
26.99%
Inventory growth of 26.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.46%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-46.76%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.00%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-67.59%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-38.21%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.