PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.63%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
6.06%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.71%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
4.87%
EBIT growth of 4.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
4.87%
Operating income growth of 4.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
9.45%
Net income growth of 9.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
7.14%
EPS growth of 7.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth of 7.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.88%
Share change of 0.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.88%
Diluted share change of 0.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.20%
OCF growth of 24.20% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
27.27%
FCF growth of 27.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-26.87%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 27.90%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-26.87%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 17.09%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-26.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 20.37%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
60.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 60.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
60.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 60.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
60.31%
3Y OCF/share growth of 60.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1.38%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
1.38%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
1.38%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.99%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.03%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.83%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.00%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
2.10%
R&D growth of 2.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
1.53%
SG&A growth of 1.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.