PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.51%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
8.67%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-26.39%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -3.02%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-26.39%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -5.16%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-26.60%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -4.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-30.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -2.04%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-30.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -2.50%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.94%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.94%
Diluted share change of 0.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.06%
OCF growth of 339.06% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
176.67%
FCF growth of 176.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
2.99%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 32.98%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
2.99%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
2.99%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 16.61%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
112.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 112.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
112.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 112.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
112.47%
3Y OCF/share growth of 112.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
21.93%
Net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier would see lagging competitiveness in core profitability.
21.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier might question fundamental disadvantages in cost structure or growth drivers.
21.93%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.33%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-1.99%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 40.21%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-1.99%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 25.49%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-1.99%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 12.56%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.52%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-20.13%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.14%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.56%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-14.27%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
10.55%
R&D growth of 10.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
15.51%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.