PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.61%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
2.34%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-21.46%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -1.98%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-21.46%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -4.16%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
50.35%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
52.38%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
52.38%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.99%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.99%
Diluted share change of 0.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.52%
OCF growth of 156.52% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
142.32%
FCF growth of 142.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
35.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median of 46.79%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
35.77%
5Y revenue/share growth near Technology median of 33.34%. Charlie Munger might see typical industry or economic growth patterns.
35.77%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.19%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
127.09%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.07% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
127.09%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
127.09%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Technology median of 11.38%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
37.87%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
37.87%
5Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier might question fundamental disadvantages in cost structure or growth drivers.
37.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 24.61%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-5.83%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 61.43%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-5.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 38.13%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-5.83%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 10.01%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.06%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
37.20%
Inventory growth of 37.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.84%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
-0.04%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-5.90%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.62%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
9.02%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.