33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.95%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
6.67%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-93.99%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 8.76%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-80.62%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -13.99%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-97.47%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -21.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-101.01%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -27.46%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-101.01%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -28.79%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.72%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.72%
Diluted share growth above 2x Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.32%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is -15.73%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-5.81%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is -7.79%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
71.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 231.52%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
71.47%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 107.23%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
129.82%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 41.53%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
158.19%
OCF/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would question if the firm is generating genuine operational cash flow over the long term.
158.19%
5Y OCF/share growth 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier would worry about a persistent shortfall vs. peers.
196.37%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Technology median of 71.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
76.40%
Net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier would see lagging competitiveness in core profitability.
76.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier might question fundamental disadvantages in cost structure or growth drivers.
72.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier might worry about a partial underperformance vs. competitor norms.
11.07%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
11.07%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
4.69%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.50%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.65%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.44%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
4.71%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
2.27%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
13.60%
R&D growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
11.38%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.