PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.43%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CFLT's 3.34%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
2.36%
Cost growth less than half of CFLT's 7.78%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
18.36%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CFLT's 1.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.34%
Margin expansion while CFLT shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-67.59%
R&D reduction while CFLT shows 18.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-50.12%
G&A reduction while CFLT shows 0.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-29.84%
Marketing expense reduction while CFLT shows 4.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CFLT shows 34.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-49.18%
Operating expenses reduction while CFLT shows 8.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.89%
Total costs reduction while CFLT shows 8.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.29%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
73.66%
EBITDA growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.78%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CFLT's 17.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
72.53%
Operating income growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.78%
Operating margin growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.31%
Other expenses growth while CFLT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
72.11%
Pre-tax income growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.42%
Pre-tax margin growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.13%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
71.92%
Net income growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.24%
Net margin growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.62%
EPS growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.62%
Diluted EPS growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.78%
Share count reduction below 50% of CFLT's 1.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
82.78%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CFLT's 1.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.