PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.51%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CFLT's 1.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
11.70%
Cost growth above 1.5x CFLT's 7.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.67%
Positive growth while CFLT shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.55%
Similar R&D growth to CFLT's 12.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-0.96%
G&A reduction while CFLT shows 13.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
22.95%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CFLT's 9.54%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.12%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x CFLT's 11.03%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
13.62%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x CFLT's 10.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
D&A growth while CFLT reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-27.87%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.33%
Other expenses growth while CFLT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-26.60%
Net income decline while CFLT shows 1.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.61%
Net margin decline while CFLT shows 3.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.00%
EPS decline while CFLT shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.00%
Diluted EPS decline while CFLT shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.94%
Share count reduction below 50% of CFLT's 1.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.94%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CFLT's 1.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.