PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CFLT's 4.40%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.08%
Cost growth above 1.5x CFLT's 6.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.79%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CFLT's 3.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.27%
Margin expansion while CFLT shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.73%
R&D growth above 1.5x CFLT's 11.88%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
14.07%
G&A growth while CFLT reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
13.89%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CFLT's 5.24%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.77%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CFLT's 6.93%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.98%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CFLT's 6.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
212.02%
Interest expense change of 212.02% while CFLT maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
803.92%
D&A growth while CFLT reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.34%
EBITDA growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.06%
EBITDA margin growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.79%
Operating income growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.70%
Operating margin growth while CFLT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.32%
Other expenses growth while CFLT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-145.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1195.77%
Tax expense growth while CFLT reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-149.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-147.93%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-147.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.08%
Share count reduction below 50% of CFLT's 1.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.08%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CFLT's 1.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.