33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.54%
Positive growth while FLNC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.86%
Cost increase while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.47%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x FLNC's 10.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-1.78%
Margin decline while FLNC shows 3.16% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
16.60%
R&D growth less than half of FLNC's 74.19%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
4.01%
G&A growth less than half of FLNC's 107.97%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
13.88%
Marketing expense growth less than half of FLNC's 127.43%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FLNC's 97.78%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
13.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FLNC's 3.15%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.37%
D&A growth while FLNC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.95%
EBITDA margin growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.33%
Operating margin growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
118.39%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FLNC's 49.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Tax expense reduction while FLNC shows 134.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.24%
Net income decline while FLNC shows 66.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.05%
Net margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 64.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.25%
EPS decline while FLNC shows 69.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.25%
Diluted EPS decline while FLNC shows 69.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.