PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.63%
Revenue growth below 50% of FLNC's 124.89%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
11.71%
Cost growth less than half of FLNC's 123.64%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.06%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FLNC's 155.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.46%
Margin decline while FLNC shows 13.80% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.10%
R&D growth less than half of FLNC's 17.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-5.45%
G&A reduction while FLNC shows 1.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
5.02%
Marketing expense growth less than half of FLNC's 18.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.67%
Operating expenses growth while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.55%
Total costs growth less than half of FLNC's 103.29%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2468.33%
Interest expense growth while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-83.55%
D&A reduction while FLNC shows 10.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.95%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FLNC's 27.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.76%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 67.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.87%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FLNC's 1.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.61%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 56.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2668.33%
Other expenses growth while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.57%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FLNC's 0.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.05%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 55.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-94.47%
Tax expense reduction while FLNC shows 79.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.45%
Net income growth below 50% of FLNC's 33.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.86%
Net margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 70.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.14%
EPS growth below 50% of FLNC's 34.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FLNC's 34.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.88%
Share count reduction below 50% of FLNC's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.88%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FLNC's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.