PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.51%
Positive growth while FLNC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.70%
Cost increase while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.67%
Positive growth while FLNC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.55%
R&D growth above 1.5x FLNC's 5.21%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-0.96%
G&A reduction while FLNC shows 7.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
22.95%
Marketing expense growth while FLNC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.12%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FLNC's 7.71%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.62%
Total costs growth while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
D&A growth above 1.5x FLNC's 0.32%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-27.87%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.33%
Other expenses growth less than half of FLNC's 122.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-30.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-26.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.94%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FLNC's 2.12%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.94%
Diluted share increase while FLNC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.