33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.31%
Revenue growth below 50% of FLNC's 154.11%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
12.08%
Cost growth less than half of FLNC's 167.49%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
17.79%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FLNC's 89.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.27%
Margin expansion while FLNC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.73%
Similar R&D growth to FLNC's 22.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
14.07%
G&A growth above 1.5x FLNC's 2.19%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
13.89%
Marketing expense growth less than half of FLNC's 52.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.77%
Similar operating expenses growth to FLNC's 16.25%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
14.98%
Total costs growth less than half of FLNC's 143.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
212.02%
Interest expense change of 212.02% while FLNC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
803.92%
D&A growth while FLNC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.34%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FLNC's 697.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.06%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 213.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.79%
Operating income growth below 50% of FLNC's 760.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.70%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FLNC's 238.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.32%
Other expenses growth less than half of FLNC's 278.45%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-145.72%
Pre-tax income decline while FLNC shows 1325.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.27%
Pre-tax margin decline while FLNC shows 460.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1195.77%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FLNC's 86.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-149.00%
Net income decline while FLNC shows 5994.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.08%
Net margin decline while FLNC shows 2298.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-147.93%
EPS decline while FLNC shows 5965.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-147.93%
Diluted EPS decline while FLNC shows 5946.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.08%
Share count reduction below 50% of FLNC's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.08%
Diluted share increase while FLNC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.