33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.61%
Positive growth while FLNC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.58%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.34%
Positive growth while FLNC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.72%
Margin expansion while FLNC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.62%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
4.59%
G&A growth while FLNC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
10.85%
Marketing expense growth while FLNC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.31%
Operating expenses growth while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.87%
Total costs growth while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while FLNC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.57%
D&A reduction while FLNC shows 9.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
52.06%
EBITDA growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.82%
EBITDA margin growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
49.87%
Pre-tax income growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.66%
Pre-tax margin growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-79.57%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
50.35%
Net income growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.14%
Net margin growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.38%
EPS growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.38%
Diluted EPS growth while FLNC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.99%
Share count reduction below 50% of FLNC's 0.47%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.99%
Diluted share increase while FLNC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.