PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.95%
Revenue growth below 50% of FLNC's 39.60%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.57%
Cost growth less than half of FLNC's 31.98%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.67%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FLNC's 109.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.68%
Margin expansion below 50% of FLNC's 49.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.60%
Similar R&D growth to FLNC's 17.60%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
19.46%
G&A growth while FLNC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
8.35%
Marketing expense growth while FLNC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while FLNC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.45%
Operating expenses growth while FLNC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.10%
Total costs growth less than half of FLNC's 25.56%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
D&A growth while FLNC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-127.84%
EBITDA decline while FLNC shows 144.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.05%
EBITDA margin decline while FLNC shows 131.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.62%
Operating income decline while FLNC shows 118.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.48%
Operating margin decline while FLNC shows 113.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
29.93%
Other expenses growth less than half of FLNC's 313.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-138.19%
Pre-tax income decline while FLNC shows 126.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-124.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while FLNC shows 118.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.46%
Tax expense reduction while FLNC shows 329.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-97.47%
Net income decline while FLNC shows 120.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.39%
Net margin decline while FLNC shows 114.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.01%
EPS decline while FLNC shows 120.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.01%
Diluted EPS decline while FLNC shows 104.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.72%
Share count reduction below 50% of FLNC's 0.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.72%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FLNC's 41.28%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.