PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.94%
Similar revenue growth to GTLB's 7.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
6.91%
Cost growth less than half of GTLB's 13.82%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.95%
Similar gross profit growth to GTLB's 7.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.01%
Margin expansion while GTLB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.80%
R&D growth less than half of GTLB's 13.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-1.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
2.75%
Marketing expense growth less than half of GTLB's 5.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.49%
Operating expenses growth while GTLB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x GTLB's 0.80%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.57%
D&A reduction while GTLB shows 52.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-125.02%
EBITDA decline while GTLB shows 24.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-110.42%
EBITDA margin decline while GTLB shows 30.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.82%
Operating income growth 50-75% of GTLB's 22.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
17.54%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of GTLB's 27.81%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-4.54%
Other expenses reduction while GTLB shows 20.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.14%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of GTLB's 35.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.77%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of GTLB's 40.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
177.13%
Tax expense growth while GTLB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.87%
Net income growth below 50% of GTLB's 123.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of GTLB's 121.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.40%
EPS growth below 50% of GTLB's 123.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.40%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GTLB's 122.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.96%
Share count reduction below 50% of GTLB's 0.96%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.96%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 5.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.