PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.48%
Revenue growth 50-75% of GTLB's 16.46%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
21.79%
Similar cost growth to GTLB's 27.49%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
6.10%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GTLB's 15.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
325.97%
R&D growth above 1.5x GTLB's 16.00%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
259.38%
G&A growth above 1.5x GTLB's 38.01%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
112.32%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x GTLB's 13.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.37%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x GTLB's 18.49%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
161.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x GTLB's 19.14%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while GTLB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
496.01%
D&A growth less than half of GTLB's 1067.07%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-749.62%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-668.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-679.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-605.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.93%
Other expenses reduction while GTLB shows 9.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-677.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-603.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4042.11%
Tax expense growth while GTLB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-679.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-605.11%
Net margin decline while GTLB shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-600.00%
EPS decline while GTLB shows 48.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-600.00%
Diluted EPS decline while GTLB shows 48.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.45%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 116.25%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
10.94%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 116.25%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.