33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.51%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
11.70%
Cost increase while GTLB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 3.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.76%
Margin decline while GTLB shows 0.68% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.55%
R&D growth 50-75% of GTLB's 15.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-0.96%
G&A reduction while GTLB shows 15.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
22.95%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x GTLB's 6.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.12%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x GTLB's 10.47%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
13.62%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x GTLB's 9.42%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
D&A growth 50-75% of GTLB's 2.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-27.87%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.33%
Other expenses growth less than half of GTLB's 50.49%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-30.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.52%
Tax expense reduction while GTLB shows 292.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.94%
Share count reduction below 50% of GTLB's 1.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.94%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GTLB's 1.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.