PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.95%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 1.46%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
3.57%
Cost growth less than half of GTLB's 9.47%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 0.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.68%
Margin expansion while GTLB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.60%
R&D growth above 1.5x GTLB's 4.02%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
19.46%
G&A growth above 1.5x GTLB's 10.43%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
8.35%
Similar marketing expense growth to GTLB's 8.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while GTLB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.45%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x GTLB's 10.40%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
10.10%
Similar total costs growth to GTLB's 9.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
D&A growth while GTLB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-127.84%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-115.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
29.93%
Other expenses growth while GTLB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-138.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-124.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.46%
Tax expense reduction while GTLB shows 124.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-97.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.01%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.01%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.72%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 2.44%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.72%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GTLB's 2.44%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.