33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.64%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x TOST's 11.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
12.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x TOST's 6.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.88%
Gross profit growth below 50% of TOST's 33.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.21%
Margin expansion below 50% of TOST's 19.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.64%
R&D growth above 1.5x TOST's 10.45%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
6.67%
G&A growth less than half of TOST's 14.71%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
5.62%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of TOST's 9.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.55%
Similar operating expenses growth to TOST's 11.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
9.30%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x TOST's 8.14%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-36.16%
Interest expense reduction while TOST shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.08%
D&A change of 3.08% while TOST maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-0.66%
EBITDA decline while TOST shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.64%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of TOST's 62.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.38%
Operating income decline while TOST shows 14.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of TOST's 22.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-163.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.59%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.15%
Pre-tax margin growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-94.84%
Tax expense reduction while TOST shows 91.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.19%
Net margin growth while TOST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x TOST's 4.65%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.56%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TOST's 0.82%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
