PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.95%
Revenue growth below 50% of TOST's 15.93%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.57%
Cost growth less than half of TOST's 16.85%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.67%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of TOST's 13.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.68%
Margin expansion while TOST shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.60%
R&D growth above 1.5x TOST's 8.33%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
19.46%
G&A change of 19.46% while TOST maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.35%
Marketing expense growth 1.25-1.5x TOST's 6.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize spending rationale.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.45%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x TOST's 2.97%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.10%
Total costs growth 50-75% of TOST's 13.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
D&A growth while TOST reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-127.84%
EBITDA decline while TOST shows 40.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.05%
EBITDA margin decline while TOST shows 21.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.62%
Operating income decline while TOST shows 86.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.48%
Operating margin decline while TOST shows 60.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
29.93%
Other expenses growth while TOST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-138.19%
Pre-tax income decline while TOST shows 43.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-124.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while TOST shows 23.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.46%
Tax expense reduction while TOST shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-97.47%
Net income decline while TOST shows 42.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.39%
Net margin decline while TOST shows 23.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.01%
EPS decline while TOST shows 47.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.01%
Diluted EPS decline while TOST shows 47.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.72%
Share count reduction below 50% of TOST's 0.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.72%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TOST's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.