PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-6.23%
Negative ROE while DAVA stands at 4.53%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-3.78%
Negative ROA while DAVA stands at 3.37%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-5.42%
Negative ROCE while DAVA is at 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
72.17%
Gross margin above 1.5x DAVA's 31.76%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
-37.38%
Negative operating margin while DAVA has 14.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-34.48%
Negative net margin while DAVA has 11.97%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.