PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
6.79%
ROE above 1.5x PAGS's 2.86%. David Dodd would confirm if such superior profitability is sustainable.
-4.08%
Negative ROA while PAGS stands at 0.97%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-5.23%
Negative ROCE while PAGS is at 6.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
72.07%
Gross margin above 1.5x PAGS's 42.59%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
-46.47%
Negative operating margin while PAGS has 23.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-47.65%
Negative net margin while PAGS has 9.44%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.