PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
5.16%
ROE above 1.5x PAGS's 3.29%. David Dodd would confirm if such superior profitability is sustainable.
-3.86%
Negative ROA while PAGS stands at 0.88%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-5.82%
Negative ROCE while PAGS is at 9.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
72.08%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x PAGS's 53.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-28.36%
Negative operating margin while PAGS has 35.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-28.51%
Negative net margin while PAGS has 9.53%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.