PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-25.56%
Negative ROE while PAGS stands at 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-16.12%
Negative ROA while PAGS stands at 0.89%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-20.47%
Negative ROCE while PAGS is at 8.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
69.22%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x PAGS's 49.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-200.19%
Negative operating margin while PAGS has 35.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-201.00%
Negative net margin while PAGS has 10.40%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.