33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-7.35%
Negative ROE while PAGS stands at 3.49%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-4.24%
Negative ROA while PAGS stands at 0.81%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-6.55%
Negative ROCE while PAGS is at 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
71.83%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x PAGS's 48.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-37.11%
Negative operating margin while PAGS has 32.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-33.21%
Negative net margin while PAGS has 11.49%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.