33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
6.79%
Positive ROE while PATH is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
-4.08%
Negative ROA while PATH stands at 3.03%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-5.23%
Negative ROCE while PATH is at 2.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
72.07%
Gross margin 75-90% of PATH's 90.31%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
-46.47%
Negative operating margin while PATH has 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-47.65%
Negative net margin while PATH has 12.63%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.