PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.45%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-11.65%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-30.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-30.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-23.23%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-23.23%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-12.94%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-16.35%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.53%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-103.69%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
66.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 12170.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
66.25%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1398.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
66.25%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 420.01%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
46.83%
OCF/share CAGR of 46.83% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
46.83%
OCF/share CAGR of 46.83% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
46.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 46.83% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1.07%
Below 50% of BIDU's 24868.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1.07%
Below 50% of BIDU's 2032.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
1.07%
Below 50% of BIDU's 927.95%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.88%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.47%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 7.11%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
31.24%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 11.70%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
4.28%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
23.39%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 7.10%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
15.96%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.