PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.91%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 27.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.61%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 31.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-295.01%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 34.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-295.01%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 34.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-176.59%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 47.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-230.42%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 46.27%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-230.42%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 46.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-12.12%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-12.12%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.12%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1325.00%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
72.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 15595.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
72.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1220.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
72.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 392.03%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
145.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 145.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
145.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 145.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
145.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 145.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-185.50%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while BIDU is at 36520.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-185.50%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while BIDU is 1796.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-185.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while BIDU is 615.26%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.55%
AR growth well above BIDU's 47.79%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.80%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 14.21%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
170.58%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 15.28%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
360.78%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 23.10%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
246.15%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 22.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.