PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.59%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
26.28%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
38.73%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
38.73%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
172.88%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
222.95%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
222.95%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.95%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.55%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.40%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
511.39%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
29.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 20174.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
29.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 960.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
29.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 54961.85%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
23.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 23.26% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
23.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 23.26% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
23.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 23.26% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-86.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while BIDU is at 40874.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-86.86%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while BIDU is 1116.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-86.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while BIDU is 30351.09%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
121.48%
Below 50% of BIDU's 24586.06%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
121.48%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1136.56%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
121.48%
Below 50% of BIDU's 441.65%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.18%
Firm’s AR is declining while BIDU shows 38.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.83%
Negative asset growth while BIDU invests at 39.69%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-24.57%
We have a declining book value while BIDU shows 12.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
161.20%
Debt shrinking faster vs. BIDU's 398.29%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
21.72%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 14.16%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
15.05%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 23.27%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.