PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.35%
Revenue growth similar to BIDU's 26.68%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
29.00%
Gross profit growth similar to BIDU's 27.25%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
65.95%
EBIT growth above 1.5x BIDU's 31.37%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
65.95%
Operating income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 31.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
52.53%
Net income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 29.42%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
55.56%
EPS growth above 1.5x BIDU's 27.03%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
44.44%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x BIDU's 27.03%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.44%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
OCF growth above 1.5x BIDU's 46.65%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
168.88%
FCF growth above 1.5x BIDU's 54.70%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
100.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 21622.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
100.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 822.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
100.05%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 292.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
912.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 912.04% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
912.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 912.04% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
912.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 912.04% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
36.20%
Below 50% of BIDU's 34820.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
36.20%
Below 50% of BIDU's 876.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
36.20%
Below 50% of BIDU's 214.11%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.66%
AR growth well above BIDU's 25.11%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.70%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 9.53%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.99%
Under 50% of BIDU's 10.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.41%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 16.17%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
16.62%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 27.12%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.