PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.22%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 7.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
38.77%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
46.47%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
46.47%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.22%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.53%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
17.65%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.32%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.19%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.58%
OCF growth of 29.58% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
12.31%
FCF growth of 12.31% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
120.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 30332.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
120.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1155.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
120.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 112.20%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
133.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 133.08% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
133.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 133.08% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
133.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
66.27%
Below 50% of BIDU's 40652.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
66.27%
Below 50% of BIDU's 976.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
66.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 35.16%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
204.94%
Below 50% of BIDU's 36158.77%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
204.94%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1117.22%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
204.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 150.52%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.18%
AR growth well above BIDU's 1.78%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.84%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 11.01%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
17.02%
1.25-1.5x BIDU's 11.80%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-17.22%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.57%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 15.89%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
36.88%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 34.57%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.