PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.07%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 12.80%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
8.25%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 13.53%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
0.50%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 10.16%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.50%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 10.16%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.78%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 9.29%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.99%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.11%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.24%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.94%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-12.16%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
213.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 14386.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
213.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 944.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
213.43%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 222.11%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
106.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 106.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
106.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 106.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
106.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 106.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
229.82%
Below 50% of BIDU's 40482.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
229.82%
Below 50% of BIDU's 676.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
229.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 104.93%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.54%
AR growth well above BIDU's 22.47%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 6.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
14.63%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 8.29%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-14.72%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
23.58%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 5.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
14.05%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 25.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.