PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.23%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
21.23%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-21.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-13.22%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.35%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-16.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
6.27%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.51%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.84%
OCF growth of 26.84% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
39.16%
FCF growth of 39.16% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
199.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 14671.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
199.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 121558.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
199.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 212.37%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
172.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 172.66% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
172.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 172.66% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
172.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
102.44%
Below 50% of BIDU's 33256.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
102.44%
Below 50% of BIDU's 34913.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
102.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 56.40%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
547.22%
Below 50% of BIDU's 476892.32%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
547.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 967.16%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
547.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 235.16%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.11%
AR growth well above BIDU's 22.52%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.13%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 9.25%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
59.93%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 9.12%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-16.19%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
82.73%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 16.59%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
50.71%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 30.53%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.