PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.08%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 30.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
16.79%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 36.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
36.44%
EBIT growth 50-75% of BIDU's 60.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
36.44%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 60.98%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
40.47%
Net income growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 49.51%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
44.44%
EPS growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 50.59%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
38.89%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 51.19%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
0.52%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.49%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.59%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
11.10%
Positive FCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
291.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 19392.52%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
291.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 757.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
126.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 201.97%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
1162.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 1162.91% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
1162.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 1162.91% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
415.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 415.05% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
158.17%
Below 50% of BIDU's 24804.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
158.17%
Below 50% of BIDU's 333.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
401.93%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 31.42%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.53%
Below 50% of BIDU's 198.77%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.36%
AR growth well above BIDU's 7.63%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.05%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 19.44%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.65%
Under 50% of BIDU's 11.38%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-19.89%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 39.07%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
10.17%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 18.65%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.14%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 31.55%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.