PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.36%
Revenue growth similar to BIDU's 10.91%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
12.06%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 8.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
14.61%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.61%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
24.62%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.08%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
24.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.45%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.46%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.60%
OCF growth of 16.60% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
6.09%
FCF growth of 6.09% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
307.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 14139.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
307.00%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 340.74%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
203.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 194.91%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
234.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 234.68% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
234.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 234.68% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
645.29%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
238.60%
Below 50% of BIDU's 22915.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
238.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 51.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1383.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 142.75%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.74%
AR growth well above BIDU's 9.81%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.30%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.56%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.51%
Positive BV/share change while BIDU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-15.44%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
8.63%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
12.89%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 46.58%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.