PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.77%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
32.69%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
75.46%
EBIT growth above 1.5x BIDU's 40.74%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
75.46%
Operating income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 40.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
74.41%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 769.81%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
71.88%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 797.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
74.19%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 794.95%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.63%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.52%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.97%
OCF growth of 28.97% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
51.20%
FCF growth of 51.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
342.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 8154.15%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
342.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 321.78%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
242.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 198.34%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
375.17%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
375.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
285.51%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
341.10%
Below 50% of BIDU's 54359.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
341.10%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1114.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
3256.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 793.56%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
673.71%
Below 50% of BIDU's 5443.15%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
673.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 429.67%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
249.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 211.35%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.31%
AR growth well above BIDU's 3.33%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.32%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 18.64%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.08%
Under 50% of BIDU's 42.30%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-9.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
3.38%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.75%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58