PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.86%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-9.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.48%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.48%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
11.45%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-3.64%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3.70%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.04%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.94%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.52%
OCF growth of 5.52% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-13.30%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
524.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 11016.85%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
524.61%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 554.39%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
215.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 167.89%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
633.53%
OCF/share CAGR of 633.53% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
633.53%
OCF/share CAGR of 633.53% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
254.86%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 128.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
530.63%
Below 50% of BIDU's 5271.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
530.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 87.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
582.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
241.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 193.74%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.25%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.40%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.55%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 2.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
2.21%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.29%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.