PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.93%
Positive revenue growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.13%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
14.01%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.01%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.11%
Net income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 28.50%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
15.28%
EPS growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 30.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
15.49%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 29.27%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.38%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.34%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.85%
OCF growth of 11.85% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
12.66%
FCF growth of 12.66% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
517.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 7251.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
517.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 339.78%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
198.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 107.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
431.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 431.91% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
431.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 431.91% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
223.32%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 223.32% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
869.72%
Below 50% of BIDU's 3407.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
869.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 65.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
433.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 2.67%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
256.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 153.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.60%
AR growth well above BIDU's 7.16%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.78%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.00%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 4.01%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.19%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 6.03%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.97%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.