PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.65%
Positive revenue growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.85%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
46.52%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
46.52%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
35.88%
Net income growth comparable to BIDU's 33.12%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
49.40%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 33.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
47.56%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 33.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.24%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.15%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.82%
OCF growth of 37.82% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
47.50%
FCF growth of 47.50% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
552.73%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 6408.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
552.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 309.35%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
195.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 92.91%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
710.12%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
710.12%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
247.57%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 247.57% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
887.91%
Below 50% of BIDU's 3037.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
887.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 102.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
494.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 49.59%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
912.61%
Below 50% of BIDU's 6461.25%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
912.61%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 506.81%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
232.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 142.22%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.07%
AR growth well above BIDU's 7.34%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.86%
Asset growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 10.33%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
9.11%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 4.59%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 13.70%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
19.81%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.