PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.82%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-11.45%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-27.15%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-27.15%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-14.07%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-14.52%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-14.05%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.29%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.20%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.15%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.60%
OCF growth of 2.60% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
3.44%
FCF growth of 3.44% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
818.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 5866.28%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
452.25%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 298.25%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
183.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 79.40%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1125.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 1125.07% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
734.33%
OCF/share CAGR of 734.33% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
247.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 31.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
997.04%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 1923.12%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
985.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
322.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
708.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 449.36%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
228.28%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 135.91%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.48%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.78%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 12.71%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.75%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.94%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.34%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.84%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.