PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-11.64%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-25.88%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.88%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
16.85%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 60.95%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
17.01%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 51.28%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
17.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 50.32%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.30%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.30%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.48%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-6.66%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1265.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 3470.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
590.20%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 251.59%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
223.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 65.60%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1800.35%
OCF/share CAGR of 1800.35% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
819.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
342.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1685.31%
Below 50% of BIDU's 4379.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1832.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 228.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
838.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 175.46%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452.07%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 341.30%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
98.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 129.99%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.29%
Firm’s AR is declining while BIDU shows 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.23%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 7.05%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.72%
75-90% of BIDU's 6.20%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.83%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.17%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.