PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.22%
Positive revenue growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
24.84%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
35.27%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
35.27%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
33.97%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
34.83%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
35.23%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.93%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.51%
Positive OCF growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-20.11%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1172.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 3122.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
476.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 186.42%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
187.48%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 44.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1182.18%
OCF/share CAGR of 1182.18% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
450.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 450.09% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
169.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 169.84% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1839.28%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 757.08% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1066.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
339.65%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1361.37%
Below 50% of BIDU's 5075.53%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
379.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 325.19%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
88.88%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 101.10%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.24%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.28%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 8.07%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.69%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 1.63%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
614.29%
Debt growth far above BIDU's 31.78%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
7.45%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 15.65%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
19.92%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 5.35%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.